The Fourth Estate’s lame attempt to characterise the
departure from the political scene of Mil The Elder as some kind of mortal blow
to his brother having
failed, and seen to have failed, today has brought a change of tack. In
have come “insiders”, on occasion
accompanied by “friends”. All are
anonymous. But their story, by the most fortunate of coincidences, fits the
press’ line.
Interestingly, the Murdoch Sun has
enlisted the services of only one “close
friend” to prop up the narrative pushed by political editor Tom Newton Dunn.
Neither does the article say whose “close
friend” this is – so it could be one of Newton Dunn’s pals in the Sun newsroom. That’s how the tabloids
operate when they can’t get a real “close
friend” to speak to them.
The Sun reinforces
its supposed revelation with another turgid diatribe from Trevor Kavanagh,
wheeling out the approved line, which is that Labour has lurched further to the
left, even though the elder Miliband was on the back benches. Readers are
treated to the spectre of union leaders, talk of “Red Ed”, and attempts to show Labour infighting which is not
actually happening.
But the serious business of source invention has been taking
place over at Dacre Towers, where
Richard Pendlebury tells Mail readers
to forget what they’ve heard already, especially from the hated BBC, because he
knows better. This is propped up by two “Westminster
sources”, which will be his fellow Mail
hacks, unless he’s splashed out and roped in someone from another paper.
They are backed up by “several
Westminster insiders”, for which read more hacks and maybe the odd Tory MP
who has been stood a decent meal in return. And then we come to the piece de
resistance, “an associate of David’s”.
So this is a genuine inside source, is it? You jest. It means someone who has
in the past associated with the elder Miliband. So that’ll be another hack,
then.
The rest is in the same vein: another “source”, and another “insider”,
who claims without any evidence that Mil The Elder had his new job fixed for
him by the Clintons. I kid you not: “Everyone
thinks the Clintons sorted his new job for him, and you would think David will
be heavily involved in Hillary’s presidential election campaign in 2016”.
They sup some strong stuff at the Mail.
That’s not to say the Mail
and Sun couldn’t stand up their
stories in court: they could. All those “friends”,
“sources” and “insiders” will exist – but they’re just fellow hacks and minor
politicians whose connection to the Milibands will turn out to be at best
tangential and at worst non-existent. The lesson to learn from this kind of
story is that it has been put together to fit the headline, with sources
selected to suit.
As such, it’s utterly worthless, but convinces today’s
readers. No change there, then.
It really pathetic the way the Tory press are trying to spin this. That these overpaid and under worked journalists can think that they can decide who should be leader of the Labour Party is outrageous. The mail's article is the usual wrong brother won crap that the media specialize in
ReplyDelete