The economy is flat-lining, unemployment is still bad,
growth is non-existent. And the press is full of bad news. So a success story
should be right up their street, a slice of good news to lift the spirits on
another grey February day. And if the story was of a British company generating
a whopping eight billion pounds’ worth of business, well, the hacks would be on
to it like a shot.
Media City Studios, Salford Quays
Well, last year there was such a success story. So where was
the Fourth Estate? Perhaps there was some greater news story for them to cover.
Maybe they just missed it. Surely no news outlet would pass it up, knowing the
story was out there? Ah well. That very much depends on the name of the
organisation making the money. Because
that organisation was the BBC.
And most of the press is screamingly hostile not just to the
BBC, but also to Channel 4, and to a lesser extent any other broadcaster (bar
the Murdoch press giving Sky a free pass, and Richard “Dirty” Desmond’s papers telling their dwindling band of readers
that Channel 5 is Really Very Wonderful, Honestly). So the UK press, by
complete coincidence you understand, ignored the news.
Perhaps the figures were unreliable? Maybe not: although the
Beeb commissioned the report, the numbers were crunched by Deloitte. The brief
was “to quantify the BBC’s economic
impact on the UK economy”. This would be “based on standard multiplier analysis”. The result would show
whether the licence fee disappeared into some kind of mythical black hole, or
brought positive benefits.
The problem for much of the Fourth Estate is that they hold
tenaciously to the mythical black hole concept: nothing, but nothing of any
benefit can be admitted to come out of the hated BBC. So unless Deloitte came
up with a conclusion that matched their prejudice, they weren’t about to splash
it all over the front page and thereby admit to having sold their readers
another pup.
So what was the Deloitte conclusion? Put directly, in 2011/12,
the Corporation’s total UK operating expenditure was £4,341 million, and the
Gross Value Added (GVA) of £8,323 million. That means the BBC generated £2 of economic value for each £1
of the licence fee. The analysis can be seen in detail HERE
[.pdf]. There were significant regional variations, with London’s share
declining.
Where, then, was the joyful reporting? It wasn’t: apart from
Digital
Spy and Movie
Scope, you’ll be hard pressed to find even a mention (the Hollywood Reporter also covered the
story). A more blatant example of selective amnesia from the Fourth Estate
would be hard to find. But rest assured that if the Beeb spends the odd 5p that
the press finds suspicious, they’ll be there in double quick time.
It’s called hypocrisy, and it’s a UK newspaper speciality. No change there, then.
Never trust any report done by the big 4 accountants which was commissioned by the organisation the report ends up praising.
ReplyDeleteThe BBC benefits the county but it also wastes tremendous amounts of money, I'd be stunned if it got anywhere near that multiplier (a 1.97 economy wide multipler seems high as well).
I'll declared an interest here and say that I'm an IT consultant that counts the BBC, Sky and most UK newspaper groups among the list of clients I've worked for in the past couple of years so have seen the levels of waste in each organisation