Colchester’s Daily
Gazette trails its print content on its website, and on Thursday the second item was “An agroraphobic woman was told
she has to attend JobCentre appointments in person - instead of via videolink -
under new rules ... Jen Lant, 22, of Marks Tey, says it is virtually impossible
to go out of her house and said she hoped to be able to work from home”.
That was at 0824 hours.
What's your problem, c***?!? She's not rich enough to f***ing sue us
By 1230 hours, Mail
Online had lifted the content, secured four photos of a relaxed and smiling
Ms Lant with her family’s pet dog (not shown here, as not relevant), and
slanted the story as blatant hit bait for its staggeringly ignorant and
inconsiderate commenters. “Unemployed
agoraphobic woman, 22, claims 'discrimination' after being told she can't
attend job centre via videolink” read the headline.
Note the use of quotes around discrimination, guiding readers to the conclusion that there isn’t
really any discrimination. And the first line of the article: “An unemployed agoraphobic who receives benefits by attending
Jobcentre meetings via videolink”, combined with the photos, is intended to
provoke one kind of reaction and one alone. She’s sitting there smirking and
getting benefits for it, commenters! Get angry!!
Jen Lant was then summarily abused by Mail Online commenters: “Not
scared to get her breasts out for the cameras ... she lives alone apart from
the dog, so who walks the dog [she doesn’t live alone] ... get your lazy ass up off the couch and go
find a job ... she’s obviously healthy, still has her limbs and can do things
without limit ... get over it and get a job ... so she has good days when she
can go shopping”.
There was a lot more, but you get the picture. Agoraphobia is not
something that can just be “got over”,
and Ms Lant is not merely “sitting there”
and doing nothing: her treatment includes hypnotherapy, which she will undergo
because she wants to be able to get out of the house without the prospect of a
panic attack. Not that the Dacre attack doggies are about to tell their readers
that.
And, just in case anyone thought that the Colchester Daily Gazette let her down,
well, no they didn’t: the reporter concerned was unaware that the Mail had lifted the story until Ms Lant
told him. Thus a lesson for all who talk to their local papers in the belief
that this is the end of the conversation – the Mail is watching many of their websites and has no qualms about
lifting content to suit their agenda.
Meanwhile, Jen Lant has received her hypnotherapy workbook
and is looking forward to this next phase of her treatment, sadder and wiser in
the knowledge that Paul Dacre’s shock troops couldn’t give a stuff about her,
especially as they know that she and her family aren’t well enough off to do
anything about it (Dacre received his own “benefit”
of £1.8 million last year).
And that’s quite a
reward for bullying vulnerable young women.
Its typical of the daily mail i read the gazette article then read the daily mail one and it was a total hate page for jen how sufferes babdly with this and cares how people veiw her!! This whole thing jas set her back months of treatement and progress she has made! I know her personally and she is anything but lazy..she wants to get better unlike most other people i know on benifits!! Big love 2 ya squeeky bollocks to the daily mail...try living our lives for a change and get your heads out of your arses!!!!
ReplyDeleteThe Daily Mail and the majority of its readers disgust me. It makes me have no faith in society that as soon as people read that someone is on benefits they instantly think they're scamming the system. Jen is a genuine genuine girl who's going through absolute hell with her agoraphobia and does not deserve people writing lies about her.
ReplyDeleteThank you for writing this blog post, it's people like you who raise the right kind of awareness.
If only Mr Dacre could experience first-hand the difficulties of living with agoraphobia, or the reality of trying to keep body and soul together for most people on benefits, the Daily Mail's output might be more balanced and honest.
ReplyDeleteHowever, as you often say, it's all about the money, money, money...