So at long last we were able to see the proposed route for the second
phase of the HS2 “Y Network” this morning. And it isn’t just a
finger-in-air and quick sketch on the back of an envelope job: it’s
all there, right down to locations of connecting lines, gradients, tunnels,
bridges and viaducts. Locations of stations are set out, and so
the arguments have now commenced.
The trains could look like this ...
There will inevitably be winners and losers: Stafford,
Stoke-on-Trent, Macclesfield, Stockport, Wilmslow and Warrington are at present
served by Virgin Trains’ Pendolino services to and from London’s Euston
terminus. None will be on HS2. Likewise Leicester, Nottingham, Derby,
Chesterfield and Wakefield on the eastern arm of the “Y” will miss out.
Thus
the compromise: high speed rail means long distances between station stops
to maintain that speed and use less energy in acceleration and braking. There
will still be Inter-City services on the lines to and from London’s St Pancras
terminus, as present operated by East Midlands Trains, and those stations on
the western arm of the “Y” will still be served, although service frequency may
change.
... but then, they could look like this
And the winners include Crewe, although the town is not to
be directly served by HS2. The new line, however, will feature a connection to
the existing network south of Crewe to enable trains to Liverpool and Chester
to run (by the time HS2 is open, electrification should have reached Chester,
and hopefully Holyhead). It will be just as beneficial as being on HS2. A
maintenance depot will also be built nearby.
There has been a less
than rapturous reception to the route news from politicians in Scotland,
but the new network will connect to both East Coast and West Coast main lines,
so offering faster journeys. Not
every destination can be served from the get-go. Elsewhere, both
CBI and TUC have responded positively, as have business leaders in London,
Sheffield, Manchester and Leeds.
And the folks at Manchester Airport must think all their
birthdays have come at once, with the prize of an HS2 station of their own.
That, together with another HS2 stop near Birmingham Airport, means more
traffic and more growth in the local economy. But there are, inevitably,
detractors, such as the Stop HS2 campaign, which has already resorted to
pejorative language and clichés rather than engagement.
That tactic has
also been employed by the so-called Taxpayers’ Alliance, but they have
already sprayed their credibility up the wall by attempting to undermine the
HS2 business case by pretending that all the cost of Crossrail 2 should be
attributed to it. Thus another group that has foregone constructive opposition
in favour of fiddling the figures – as is its wont with much of its output.
Meanwhile, all major political parties are in favour, so for now, HS2 moves forward.
Unless the plan is for this to be a nationalised rail network (yeah right) all I can see is some already rich companies rubbing their hands at the state providing all the money, and them reaping the rewards.
ReplyDeleteThere are good reasons for investing in the rail network, but what we may end up with is a faster network that even fewer people will be able to afford to use. Meanwhile the poorer will be taking whatever the equivalent of the Megabus is in 2040 or whenever.
This investment isn't happening now, oh no, not during a recession, just pencilled in for much later. It's insane. Labour needs to be brave and promise renationalisation of the rail network. Then we can talk investment rather than massive subsidies for the already rich.