Who needs David Icke? When it comes to raging paranoia,
built on the back of a good old-fashioned whipped-up conspiracy, there was
nothing to beat the former sports presenter and self-styled healer, but now
even the excursions into La-La land no longer need him: since the
Daily Mail went after training and
networking organisation Common Purpose, they’ve all been jumping aboard the
bandwagon.
The Mail hatchet
job was of course intended first and foremost to discredit the Leveson Inquiry,
by undermining the legitimacy of his advisors. In the case of David Bell, this
was partly achieved by linking him to Common Purpose. Then the Mail found “indirect” links between the group and two other Leveson advisors,
and from there asserted that it was “the
left’s old boy network”.
Moreover, it was an “incestuous”
organisation, and may have broken Data Protection law once, as opposed to the Mail, which in hiring Steve Whittamore,
broke Data Protection laws on well north of three hundred occasions. The
supposed revelations were in reality little more than a petulant rant crossed
with the Mail’s expertise in
nudge-nudgery, but that was enough for the paranoia to take hold.
And to no surprise at all, those usual suspects included James
“saviour of Western civilisation”
Delingpole, who has combined the Rotherham UKIP fostering row with Have I Got News For You to decide that
Ian Hislop may not be part of Common Purpose, but is somehow in league with it.
Del Boy talks of a “secretive Fabian
organisation” and laughably calls the Mail
hatchet job a “bravura investigation”.
Private Eye is
then smeared as “soft-left establishment”,
HIGNFY is said to be in thrall to Common Purpose graduates, and the Mail’s piece is declared to be “established fact rather than conspiracy
theory”. Hislop is denounced for not offering evidence to support his scorning
the Mail attack, and yes, this comes
from someone who never offers credible evidence to support his ranting and
abuse.
And Delingpole is not alone: the
perpetually thirsty Paul Staines, who styles himself Guido Fawkes, has
warned of “the Common
Purpose organisation which
pursues a ‘we know best’
Fabian-style progressive agenda in the public sector”, this being proved
because the Rotherham council Director of Childrens’ and Young Peoples’
Services went on one of their courses.
Staines sounds as if he is channelling Melanie “not just Barking but halfway to Upminster”
Phillips, as he talks of “progressive
ideologues ... obsessive efforts to normalise and celebrate non-traditional
family structures ... progressive imperative ... undermining marriage”. I’m
sure Staines and Delingpole are not paranoid, but that doesn’t mean they’re not
coming to get them.
Pity David Icke: thanks
to the Mail and its devotees, we no
longer need his wisdom.
I wonder to what extent the frenzy over Common Purpose is the result of a process of proof by assertion:
ReplyDeletehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_by_assertion
i.e. "If you repeat a lie often enough, it becomes the truth"
It doesn't matter that the people saying it are highly questionable. Eventually the assertion will go mainstream.
I like your blog by the way and will add it to my reading list.
Much appreciated. You're too kind.
ReplyDeleteDavid Bell authorised the procurement and distibution of an illegal blacklist containing names addresses and peronal telephone numbers of 17 other people inc myself.
ReplyDeleteCommon Purpose also told lies about the people on the list.
I have proof if you want to publish.
michaelwhite@mail2world.com