tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4433144336299288135.post670569296545532369..comments2024-03-26T13:27:26.499+00:00Comments on Zelo Street: Danczuk - More Expense PorkiesTim Fentonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00726447899972084146noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4433144336299288135.post-69493947334773181882016-02-03T11:40:39.621+00:002016-02-03T11:40:39.621+00:00Maybe a complete overule on politicians and MP ...Maybe a complete overule on politicians and MP 's employing friends and family would be welcomed by many?<br /><br />Just as an overuling of cosy friendships between Media and politicians?<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4433144336299288135.post-68062330900322564842016-02-02T22:56:52.023+00:002016-02-02T22:56:52.023+00:00The rules and allowances he's accused of falli...The rules and allowances he's accused of falling afoul were specifically designed to deal with and compensate for such 'complexities'. Danczuk clearly abused the spirit, if not the letter, of those allowances with the net result being financial gain for Him Personally Now (if I may slip into Zelo Street's house style for a second). Only an IPSA investigation (or ounce of common sense) can determine whether Simple Si did so willfully and with grasping intent.<br /><br />This whole affair also bring into the foreground the folly of IPSA's continued toleration of parliamentarian nepotism with regards staffing. They ought to have nipped that in the bud following the expenses scandal. If MPs need staff, let them request them from a central government staffing agency; if their wives, girlfriends or snotty little offspring want a job, let them applied to said agency where they can be scrutinised by impartial bosses and assigned to an unrelated and impartial MP-come-line-manager!anubeonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16129071449719839802noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4433144336299288135.post-49368439442773977822016-02-02T01:22:36.593+00:002016-02-02T01:22:36.593+00:00Dancsunk has a point: “This is an example of the c...Dancsunk has a point: “This is an example of the complexities of real life and you can design as many rules as you want but this is just how modern families work nowadays" but I don't see him going into bat for the 100,000s of low income & unemployed falling foul of 1980's market economy Blairite/Tory regulations, rather he chooses to attack Jeremy Corbyn who wants to re-address the plight of the low paid/income with his 1980 policies.<br />Simon has however made me a believer in Karma.http://www.thesocialshuttle.com/https://www.blogger.com/profile/08385625594884495221noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4433144336299288135.post-30618405802563816702016-02-01T17:31:25.267+00:002016-02-01T17:31:25.267+00:00And just think......Danksuck was at the forefront ...And just think......Danksuck was at the forefront of the New Labour hoods who've attacked Jeremy Corbyn and who took the Murdoch and Rothermere shilling...<br /><br />Don't bend over for the soap, Simon.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com