tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4433144336299288135.post5854394630871533457..comments2024-03-26T13:27:26.499+00:00Comments on Zelo Street: Anger Of The WolfmanTim Fentonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00726447899972084146noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4433144336299288135.post-57116009234004083302013-02-22T17:46:56.879+00:002013-02-22T17:46:56.879+00:00Has he actually been acquitted? I read that there ...Has he actually been acquitted? I read that there "was insufficient evidence to charge". Doesn't quite mean the same thing does it?<br /><br />And is Dan Evans off the hook?<br /><br />From The Guardian:<br /><br />"The Crown Prosecution Service confirmed in a statement that Wallis would face no further action.<br /><br />"Having carefully considered the matter, the CPS has concluded that there is insufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of conviction in relation to that journalist," it said, adding that his file had been resubmitted for charging advice in January 2013.<br /><br />Last year it had received files on 13 individuals in relation to allegations of conspiracy to intercept voicemail communication, eight of whom had been charged. It asked the Met Police to make further inquiries on two journalists in those files, Wallis and Dan Evans, a former editorial colleague on the News of the World."<br /><br />Mentions "only that journalist" singular?<br /><br />BBC site says "The other journalist remains under investigation."robnoreply@blogger.com