tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4433144336299288135.post124647592184701847..comments2024-03-26T13:27:26.499+00:00Comments on Zelo Street: The Shameful Silencing Of Mike SivierTim Fentonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00726447899972084146noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4433144336299288135.post-76129913380946701372021-01-20T16:41:06.055+00:002021-01-20T16:41:06.055+00:00Well turns out a judge thinks differently!
Well turns out a judge thinks differently!<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4433144336299288135.post-50954336422668686482019-05-05T11:49:52.697+01:002019-05-05T11:49:52.697+01:00Donated.
Isn't Lawson not being sued because h...Donated.<br />Isn't Lawson not being sued because he resides in Uruguay? I know Oberman mentioned him, by name, on radio four a while back and he sought advice.<br />God, I wouldn't be able to take a day of the abuse they get every hour but I think they've lost perspectiveBig Rignoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4433144336299288135.post-68039735243727662042019-05-04T18:50:44.987+01:002019-05-04T18:50:44.987+01:00I really hope this makes it to court - the public ...I really hope this makes it to court - the public need to know the way these 'celebrities' operate and who's writing the script. Good luck Mike. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4433144336299288135.post-90553979246701326802019-05-04T17:28:26.940+01:002019-05-04T17:28:26.940+01:00Very best of luck Mike. I fail to see how this is ...Very best of luck Mike. I fail to see how this is a case of libel when, as you say, the facts are readily available. IIRC, Lawson's article merely reprints the tweets TAO continued to send to the teenager, despite being asked to desist. When the evidence stacks up like that, how can anyone say that someone is wilfully setting out to harm their reputation?Markhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14569732807130090838noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4433144336299288135.post-80623404085821305222019-05-04T16:54:35.697+01:002019-05-04T16:54:35.697+01:00I'm not sure your headline is entirely accurat...I'm not sure your headline is entirely accurate as nobody could say I've been silenced!<br /><br />That said, your support is appreciated - and may I encourage your readers to support my CrowdJustice site. It's true that the initial target was reached in a single day but I'm now trying to reach the "stretch" target of £25,000 - itself just a fraction of what will be needed if this case ever goes to court.<br /><br />It isn't just a matter of their opinion against mine. My defence is based on the facts as they were presented on Twitter (and remain available for all to see) and the public interest inherent in presenting those facts about these people to a public who may otherwise be influenced by their claims. Opinion does have a bearing on the case, but it is my genuinely-held opinion, based on the facts available.<br /><br />The personalities concerned have presented no evidence to support a claim of libel, which demands proof that their reputation was harmed.<br /><br />In normal circumstances the case would never get anywhere near a court.Mike Sivierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11296424362081633127noreply@blogger.com